From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 859DD3858D20; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 22:33:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 859DD3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673735603;
	bh=MXAJxqjrkC/zCPyRLkAY07Iy/6Xou63a4d+jmlg36fg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hkhF7gMP4Cu5JOMZwGKSthiBPhzMluxrQHjWlcBeolR8C//8KNEe6VGgZ7dl9hAYv
	 5WrHocB3FBGev7bLJ52ZgadSE4j4r1ZXMtsV/Z0Wex/CxaV1CQz4NiNpbHmEutgZ3U
	 SX2A7RgStvnchegy9hK9otlSaEZ9ZtLuLJWav93c=
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/99408] s3251 benchmark of TSVC vectorized by
 clang runs about 7 times faster compared to gcc
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 22:33:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99408-4-DLTU1qJezf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99408-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99408-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99408

--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On Zen4 it is 20s for gcc and 6.9s for aocc, so still a problem.=