From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 268EF386F47A; Tue,  9 Mar 2021 16:39:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 268EF386F47A
From: "qing.zhao at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors,
 at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 16:39:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: qing.zhao at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99421-4-4o2KEka34i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99421-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99421-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 16:39:34 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99421

--- Comment #8 from Qing Zhao <qing.zhao at oracle dot com> ---
> On Mar 8, 2021, at 11:58 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.=
gnu.org> wrote:
>=20
> Sure. I used C-Vise:
> https://github.com/marxin/cvise

>>From my understanding, cvise is similar as creduce, but faster.
So, I am still wondering why creduce cannot reduce testing cases when using
profiling feedback due to
Profiling mismatch? But cvise can do this? Does Cvise reduce source code and
.gcda file at the same=20
time?=