From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E28383858416; Sun,  7 Apr 2024 14:56:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E28383858416
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712501808;
	bh=wnAiY2vxxuF2l43DXaY08FCXPvC9dJ5hwbsKKMYidgw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Jti8BG6RhmhtX1zT7vwovXBXQhBs05pKiJu1Uf6d7cmIOXQhRorOzsyIqY3jGb66N
	 MXfvFPQfBJ2oN2ONwAQeakx/CDCiA1ZOgbPDFNe/tkGzeHnu/DX2WRqwJx4LNZHWbt
	 2WAxSI08G4JihB5YHAy80Fdr9YGh2DJBhrCcGTJ8=
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/99426] [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster
 1186: Bad file data
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 14:56:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99426-4-JcVJrFDtN6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99426

--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Huh, interesting!  If --param=3Dggc-min-expand=3D10000 doesn't help then it=
's most
likely a distinct bug.  A testcase would be much appreciated if possible.=