From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DADA8384640C; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:19:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DADA8384640C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712179199; bh=saUFi/NiZjh8gk28p5M5kBsBmISWltgoWHO21rdhdcw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=p/JDMlT12oUpVlbyvtAEWGdJOEz60/pa9mzouDEH+Y8HX4GRp4jqFxpNwVyMoIEVY 1JGyncPxaYRx4xWJrOcIOa0jULFpnzXyhwwz2ygAMTg3MdmSOZLHe7qkgTV1WvoZ+b MgU3jyjIpH3RwR0Uo6oek6f+AD8/K0pJu1lwoyI8= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99426] [modules] failed to read compiled module cluster 1186: Bad file data Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 21:19:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99426 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- There's a patch pending review at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647203.html Until that's merged, one should be able to work around this error with a tr= unk compiler by using --param=3Dggc-min-expand=3D1000 (or an ever larger value)= to prevent garbage collection from occurring as often.=