From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5180C385042A; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:59:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5180C385042A From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99459] [11 Regression] Many coroutines regressions on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:59:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 09:59:43 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99459 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > So perhaps: > 2021-03-08 Jakub Jelinek >=20 > PR c++/99459 > * coroutines.cc (build_co_await): Look through NOP_EXPRs in > build_special_member_call return value to find the CALL_EXPR. >=20 > --- gcc/cp/coroutines.cc.jj 2021-03-05 21:51:48.671185716 +0100 > +++ gcc/cp/coroutines.cc 2021-03-08 10:53:13.187959339 +0100 > @@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ build_co_await (location_t loc, tree a, > =3D build_special_member_call (a, complete_dtor_identifier, > NULL, a_type, LOOKUP_NORMAL, > tf_none); > + if (dummy && CONVERT_EXPR_P (dummy)) > + dummy =3D TREE_OPERAND (dummy, 0); > dummy =3D dummy ? TREE_OPERAND (CALL_EXPR_FN (dummy), 0) > : NULL_TREE; > if (dummy && coro_diagnose_throwing_fn (dummy)) > @@ -1031,6 +1033,8 @@ build_co_await (location_t loc, tree a, > =3D build_special_member_call (e_proxy, complete_dtor_identifier, > NULL, o_type, LOOKUP_NORMAL, > tf_none); > + if (dummy && CONVERT_EXPR_P (dummy)) > + dummy =3D TREE_OPERAND (dummy, 0); > dummy =3D dummy ? TREE_OPERAND (CALL_EXPR_FN (dummy), 0) > : NULL_TREE; > if (dummy && coro_diagnose_throwing_fn (dummy)) >=20 > ? looks reasonable to me - but I have no way to test it at present.=