From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 866A3398E461; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:15:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 866A3398E461
From: "syq at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99488] dwz: /usr/lib/gcc/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/11/go1:
 Found two copies of .debug_line_str section
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:15:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: syq at debian dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99488-4-BR66LwwE6f@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99488-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99488-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:15:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99488

--- Comment #20 from YunQiang Su <syq at debian dot org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #15)
> (In reply to YunQiang Su from comment #14)
> > The problem sees due to some problem of LTO.
>=20
> So I if understand correctly this binutils patch is fixes the issue?  If =
so
> please close this bug as moved and open up a binutils bug and submit the
> patch there.

I have no permission to close this bug report.
Can you help me to do so?=