From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BBFE3386102B; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:14:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BBFE3386102B From: "oleksandr.koval.dev at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99495] New: constexpr virtual destructor is used before its definition Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:14:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: oleksandr.koval.dev at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_file_loc bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:14:25 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99495 Bug ID: 99495 Summary: constexpr virtual destructor is used before its definition Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL: https://godbolt.org/z/GGY6aa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: oleksandr.koval.dev at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I found this while playing with constexpr virtual functions. This code gives "error: 'virtual constexpr Derived2::~Derived2()' used before its definitio= n". Error always refers to the last variable, e.g. if we swap d1 and d2 declarations, it will complain about d1. If x is decalred without constexpr= it works fine. struct Base{ constexpr virtual ~Base() =3D default; virtual int Get() const =3D 0; // non-constexpr }; struct Derived1 : Base{ constexpr int Get() const override { return 1; } }; struct Derived2 : Base{ constexpr int Get() const override { return 2; } }; constexpr auto GetSum(){ const Derived1 d1; const Derived2 d2; const Base* pb1 =3D &d1; const Base* pb2 =3D &d2; return pb1->Get() + pb2->Get(); } constexpr // error int x =3D GetSum(); // OK if not in constexpr context=