From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A4B3A388A837; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:33:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A4B3A388A837
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99542] [9 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2219
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:33:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99542-4-rtIYLRlgpE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99542-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:33:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99542

--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fe231e4dde882cd56029e122abc4fa940ad4ac5

commit r9-9431-g0fe231e4dde882cd56029e122abc4fa940ad4ac5
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 16 10:34:44 2021 +0100

    aarch64: Fix up aarch64_simd_clone_compute_vecsize_and_simdlen [PR99542]

    As the patch shows, there are several bugs in
    aarch64_simd_clone_compute_vecsize_and_simdlen.
    One is that unlike for function declarations that aren't definitions
    it completely ignores argument types.  Such decls don't have
DECL_ARGUMENTS,
    but we can walk TYPE_ARG_TYPES instead, like the i386 backend does or l=
ike
    the simd cloning code in the middle end does too.

    Another problem is that it checks types of uniform arguments.  That is
    unnecessary, uniform arguments are passed the way it normally is, it is
    a scalar argument rather than vector, so there is no reason not to supp=
ort
    uniform argument of different size, or long double, structure etc.

    2021-03-16  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR target/99542
            * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
            (aarch64_simd_clone_compute_vecsize_and_simdlen): If not a func=
tion
            definition, walk TYPE_ARG_TYPES list if non-NULL for argument t=
ypes
            instead of DECL_ARGUMENTS.  Ignore types for uniform arguments.

            * gcc.dg/gomp/pr99542.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/gomp/pr59669-2.c (bar): Don't expect a warning on aarc=
h64.
            * gcc.dg/gomp/simd-clones-2.c (setArray): Likewise.
            * g++.dg/vect/simd-clone-7.cc (bar): Likewise.
            * g++.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.C (f37): Expect a different warning
            on aarch64.
            * gcc.dg/declare-simd.c (fn2): Expect a new warning on aarch64.

    (cherry picked from commit 06589d2232abc92ac9bcb43e4a4ec64ead627752)=