From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 01AE1384DB4B; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:58:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 01AE1384DB4B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708005530;
	bh=inYFK7v2YP9pzY6RXt9NTIsXYPKZwfyRxmesMEnBWFc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rvKGGeyY+5KXqHOaQWMzHm3UlmCvwjTSarbEtnyPg3XEZqmuyxGcJZRshXb/G2Doc
	 fq0cFUy2E+5KjPwr66lLxyK5eZCUhIXDomK1hlC2J467GdmslBFHN/5kPL7aivWCUt
	 dpKYvJM0swWUscTVuoNxJfOyMAYf9gz/QFHiQ0JE=
From: "gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/99546] Weird return value of C++20 requires expression
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:58:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-99546-4-3MZDUew1Zo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99546

Andrew Giese <gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot =
com

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Giese <gieseanw+gcc at gmail dot com> ---
This bug in the OP appears to have been fixed as early as gcc 11.1.

For reference, I'm referring to the following code:

int main() {
  constexpr auto b =3D requires { []{}; };
  static_assert(b);
  static_assert(!b);
}

https://godbolt.org/z/WzzGMxcz6


Note that the code listed in Jonathan's comment above still fails in 14.0.1
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99546#c6)=