From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 96C2A384DB4B; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:09:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 96C2A384DB4B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1708006146;
	bh=z+tyEL1ewV6Ppa0K/B3c2RvVL7vOKUY5y1eHzfvaT+g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=umb4WtDJTuMLM3lqikb5WkhODIQ7qCv4Wvn2H8ofoGjMNrMVBRjgc8riBlBeW37Wi
	 9OSeCyAl9DQjN5ObZ2psLd185Jq15dv9v6ujuUR39K3TxIK1kkEDpVGGYcSK2c0yYk
	 tZI95Ke0wLmea6I/E2uTa2Q2J9DymjW4SoobPIKM=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/99546] Weird return value of C++20 requires expression
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:09:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-99546-4-bjHXEL7IxM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99546

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2022-09-20 00:00:00         |2024-2-15

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The OP's example is supposed to be ill-formed though, it shouldn't compile
successfully. So I don't think it's fixed.=