From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6D33E3893655; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:08:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D33E3893655 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/99552] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/wait_notify/bool.cc (test for excess errors) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:08:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:08:52 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99552 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2021-03-11 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99306 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #0) > FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/wait_notify/bool.cc (test for excess errors) > Excess errors: > /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/wait_notify/bo= ol. > cc:64: warning: alignment (64) for _ZZNSt8__detail9__waiters6_S_forEPKvE3= __w > exceeds maximum alignment for global common data. Using 32 See also PR 99306 > Usually, I add "-fno-common" to avoid these warnings on hppa*-*-hpux*. Isn't that redundant for C++, and on by default for C in GCC 11 anyway?=