public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/99578] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:40:41 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-99578-4-S8jfyJOBm4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-99578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The warning is by design. Its purpose is to detect invalid accesses at non-zero offsets to null pointers, like in the memset call below: struct S { int a, b[4]; }; void f (struct S *p) { if (p) return; memset (p->b, 0, 4 * sizeof p->b); } For now, I recommend suppressing the warning either by #pragma GCC diagnostic or by making the pointer volatile. In the future, providing an attribute to annotate constant addresses with (or extending the io() attribute supported by some targets to all targets) might be another way to avoid it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-13 20:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-13 14:23 [Bug c/99578] New: " arnd at linaro dot org 2021-03-13 20:40 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-03-13 21:40 ` [Bug c/99578] " arnd at linaro dot org 2021-03-13 22:38 ` arnd at linaro dot org 2021-03-14 0:57 ` [Bug middle-end/99578] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-14 11:54 ` arnd at linaro dot org 2021-03-14 21:25 ` arnd at linaro dot org 2021-03-15 8:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-15 19:57 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-15 20:24 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-21 19:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-28 16:11 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-01 15:08 ` andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2021-05-19 15:07 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-19 18:01 ` andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com 2021-05-19 19:19 ` andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com 2021-05-19 20:48 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-30 23:40 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-24 16:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-14 18:46 ` [Bug middle-end/99578] [11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-19 11:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-21 13:53 ` pmenzel+gcc at molgen dot mpg.de 2022-01-14 15:57 ` pmenzel+gcc at molgen dot mpg.de 2022-01-21 13:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-23 10:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-23 12:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-23 16:50 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-23 16:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-23 17:55 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-07 19:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-07 20:53 ` goswin-v-b at web dot de 2022-03-16 19:49 ` kees at outflux dot net 2022-03-16 21:15 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-16 23:10 ` jwerner at chromium dot org 2022-03-17 10:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-17 10:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-17 12:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-18 18:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-18 18:05 ` [Bug middle-end/99578] [11 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-19 11:02 ` goswin-v-b at web dot de 2022-03-29 5:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-30 8:04 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-30 8:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-99578-4-S8jfyJOBm4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).