From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A2BAE3858D29; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 08:38:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2BAE3858D29
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/99578] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread
 warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 08:38:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on blocked everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-99578-4-WXcxxRd58t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 08:38:35 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99578

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-03-15
             Blocks|                            |56456
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note heuristically 0xe8ffc000 isn't likely such an offset from a NULL point=
er
object because the object would be quite large.

The diagnostic could maybe also clarify that it assumes 0xe8ffc000 is an
offsetted NULL pointer.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D56456
[Bug 56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds=