From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 65B87384C005; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:54:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65B87384C005
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99593] [11 Regression] arm Neon ICE when compiling
 firefox (skia) since r11-6708
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:54:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99593-4-eGpkbAxhP7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99593-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:54:14 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99593

--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Comment on attachment 50412 [details]
> proposed testcase
>=20
> Any reason not to replace
> __simd128_int32_t with int32x4_t ,
> __simd128_float32_t with float32x4_t and
> __simd128_uint32_t with uint32x2_t ?
> Drop the commented out __builtin_* names etc.?  Drop the (__builtin_neon_=
hi
> *) cast?
> Otherwise LGTM if it still FAILs without the above patch and PASSes with =
it,
> but the final call is Kyrill's (or other ARM maintainers').

Indeed. Let's have a consolidated patch on gcc-patches for review.=