From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EB7503857C44; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:48:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EB7503857C44 From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug web/99598] New: Commits are not transferred to bugzilla Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:48:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: web X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:48:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99598 Bug ID: 99598 Summary: Commits are not transferred to bugzilla Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2021-March/343081.html , which is not distributed to bugzilla and the gcc-bugs mailing list, despite the ChangeLog entry reading Handle EXEC_IOLENGTH in doloop_contained_procedure_code. This rather obvious patch fixes an ICE on valid which came about because I did not handle EXEC_IOLENGTH as start of an I/O statement when checking for the DO loop variable. This is an 11 regression. gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/99345 * frontend-passes.c (doloop_contained_procedure_code): Properly handle EXEC_IOLENGTH. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortran/99345 * gfortran.dg/do_check_16.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/do_check_17.f90: New test.=