From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 18BBB3858D29; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:25:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 18BBB3858D29
From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/99602] [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual
 argument not associated
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:25:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99602-4-JPDFWLnQbT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 22:25:22 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99602

--- Comment #31 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #30)
> Created attachment 50442 [details]
> Patch that "fixes" all versions of the problem.. so far :-)
>=20
> Hi Juergen,
>=20
> I think that this one does the job... it is even correct and regtests OK;=
-)
>=20
> I found that the gdb session was a miserable afair that didn't help at all
> because of the change in dwarf versions. I would up reducing the testcase=
 to
> what you will find below. Please excuse my mutilation of Whizard!
>=20
> The chunk of whizard that you provided throws up all sorts of memories. In
> the 1970's I used to go up to Caltech every Wednesday for Feynman and
> Gell-mann seminars. I was around for the earliest days of partons and the
> realisation that quarks might even be real.
>=20
> Paul
>=20

Hi Paul,
that's a much nicer reproducer, congrats! And thanks for fixing this regres=
sion
so timely. I confirm that all our tests work again with this fix. I guess t=
he
compilation and running with default flags (-g -O2) is not affected by this
fix? But I will test once the fix is committed.=20
Nice to hear that you had such a fun time at Calteach. I was never there
unfortunately, but visited Stanford U. and SLAC a lot. And I was lucky to m=
eet
Gell-Mann as well, 2008 in Aspen at the physics center.=20
To me the fix looks good to go, when it is pushed I will recompile gcc and =
run
our code with all different combinations again.
All the best,
   JRR=