public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "michalz at nvidia dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99613] New: Static variable destruction order race condition Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:58:33 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-99613-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99613 Bug ID: 99613 Summary: Static variable destruction order race condition Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: michalz at nvidia dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50394 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50394&action=edit Race condition demo Function static variables should be destroyed in the reverse order of initialization. However, the lock is released before calling atexit to register the destructor, allowing for a race condition to occur if multiple threads are accessing static variables for the first time. The bug affects all versions of GCC that I've tried (6.4, 7.3, 8.2, 9.3, 10.2) on multiple platforms. The error in output assembly can be seen when compiling the following code: struct S{ S(); ~S(); }; S& foo(){ static S s; return s; } The attached file contains a working example that triggers the race condition (it's a race condition, so sometimes it succeeds).
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 10:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-16 10:58 michalz at nvidia dot com [this message] 2021-03-16 11:42 ` [Bug c++/99613] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:37 ` michalz at nvidia dot com 2021-03-16 12:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 13:04 ` michalz at nvidia dot com 2021-03-16 13:07 ` michalz at nvidia dot com 2021-03-16 13:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 13:24 ` michalz at nvidia dot com 2021-03-16 13:25 ` michalz at nvidia dot com 2021-03-16 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 14:05 ` michalz at nvidia dot com 2021-03-16 14:07 ` jacobhemstad at gmail dot com 2021-03-16 14:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 14:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 20:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 23:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-20 23:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-22 16:51 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-22 17:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-11 14:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-99613-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).