public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug analyzer/99614] New: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ?
@ 2021-03-16 11:14 dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2021-03-16 11:39 ` [Bug analyzer/99614] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dcb314 at hotmail dot com @ 2021-03-16 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99614
Bug ID: 99614
Summary: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy
constructor ?
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
>From this morning's static check of the source code of gcc:
trunk.git/gcc/analyzer/diagnostic-manager.cc:85:7: warning: Class
'epath_finder' does not have a copy constructor which is recommended since it
has dynamic memory/resource allocation(s). [noCopyConstructor]
trunk.git/gcc/analyzer/diagnostic-manager.cc:85:7: warning: Class
'epath_finder' does not have a operator= which is recommended since it has
dynamic memory/resource allocation(s). [noOperatorEq]
Class epath_finder has constructor and destructor, but neither
copy constructor nor operator =. This is not standard practice in C++.
Further advice sought.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug analyzer/99614] diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? 2021-03-16 11:14 [Bug analyzer/99614] New: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? dcb314 at hotmail dot com @ 2021-03-16 11:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-16 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99614 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unknown |11.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Guess they could be deleted instead if the object is never copied. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug analyzer/99614] diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? 2021-03-16 11:14 [Bug analyzer/99614] New: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2021-03-16 11:39 ` [Bug analyzer/99614] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-16 12:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 1:24 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-16 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99614 Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2021-03-16 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- It has a reference member, so its assignment operator is already deleted, so cppcheck is wrong to warn about that. It should have a user-declared (possibly deleted) copy constructor though. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug analyzer/99614] diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? 2021-03-16 11:14 [Bug analyzer/99614] New: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2021-03-16 11:39 ` [Bug analyzer/99614] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 1:24 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 13:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 13:09 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99614 David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Working on a fix. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug analyzer/99614] diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? 2021-03-16 11:14 [Bug analyzer/99614] New: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? dcb314 at hotmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-03-19 1:24 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 13:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 13:09 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99614 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm <dmalcolm@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21d09cb732dac5d980ac628eb3aca75c821028a2 commit r11-7734-g21d09cb732dac5d980ac628eb3aca75c821028a2 Author: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> Date: Fri Mar 19 09:01:57 2021 -0400 analyzer: mark epath_finder with DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN [PR99614] cppcheck warns that class epath_finder does dynamic memory allocation, but is missing a copy constructor and operator=. This class isn't meant to be copied or assigned, so mark it with DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN. gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/99614 * diagnostic-manager.cc (class epath_finder): Add DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug analyzer/99614] diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? 2021-03-16 11:14 [Bug analyzer/99614] New: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? dcb314 at hotmail dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2021-03-19 13:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 13:09 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-03-19 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99614 David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Should be fixed by the above commit. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-19 13:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-03-16 11:14 [Bug analyzer/99614] New: diagnostic-manager.cc:85: possible missing copy constructor ? dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2021-03-16 11:39 ` [Bug analyzer/99614] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-16 12:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 1:24 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 13:04 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-03-19 13:09 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).