From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6E9C4385781A; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:56:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6E9C4385781A
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/99618] `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' referenced in section
 `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' of X defined in discarded section
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:56:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99618-4-SeEAVnxVRR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99618-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99618-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:56:53 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99618

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> > I don't see how that is any different from the above.  The intent is (a=
nd it
> > has been working fine for years) that linker merges the comdat sections=
 with
> > the same hash into one, and the import relocations resolve to the start=
 of
> > that section.
>=20
> This works if the symbol reference to the comdat section is global.

Ah, yeah.  The issue is we get a SECTION relocation because we use a
local label here?=