From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 38FF53858C52; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:47:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 38FF53858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664156873;
	bh=zG5lgGqiaIlxHFtEk/SlGcdqteDsFoMqx0AXTe476hQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dDVSXx2LhgJXQYpSB79pL97fBDgfDMChJx3mG2Qi10ftAp7zzCrid9a50G0T3SsBh
	 m0yeBSAKNR6/3BZ1A56O6jNbHDYsY0tMoI0YtXtihgyCuHaffI9UdDJY08IkIBQPNi
	 M3J1oEbQ4K0bvb7oZSgf/0ySmODcwSzc/mNMIy6M=
From: "johelegp at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be
 const
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 01:47:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: johelegp at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99631-4-3l13yX6uSd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99631-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99631-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99631

--- Comment #6 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Pe=C3=B1a <johelegp at gmail dot=
 com> ---
> But wrong-code isn't really right either [...]

Oh, you already mentioned them. I suggest 'non-conforming-result', or somet=
hing
more appropriate than "result" to indicate the metaprogrammingness of it.=