From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 63AAF386F024; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:39:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 63AAF386F024 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/99648] [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:39:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cf_reconfirmed_on target_milestone bug_status everconfirmed component Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:39:20 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99648 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code Last reconfirmed| |2021-03-19 Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|other |target --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Yes, there's cfgexpand.c avoid_type_punning_on_regs which looks for integral accesses of FP registers but only disables + && maybe_lt (GET_MODE_PRECISION (DECL_MODE (base)), + GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE_INNER (DECL_MODE (base)))) so the question is how the situation is with the case where it execute FAILs (I can't check/verify that easily). Can you please show failing assembler = and RTL?=