From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 243043860C37; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:57:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 243043860C37
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99708] __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ not defined on
 powerpc64le-linux
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:57:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99708-4-tKHI6xodjG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99708-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99708-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:57:18 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99708

--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> > In an ideal world the user can just assume those types exist always.

^^^^^^^^

> Arguably a __SIZEOF_xxx__ macro isn't a very sensible macro for types whe=
re
> the type has a guaranteed size,

Yes.  And it does not mean the type exist (or is usable), either.

> but we need *something* that says the type
> exists.

Do we?  The types should always exist!

> Since all other targets already use __SIZEOF_xxx__ to say that the
> type exists, it would be consistent and helpful for powerpc to do the sam=
e.

Other targets do not have __ieee128 or __ibm128.=