From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5A7FE385782A; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:56:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5A7FE385782A
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99708] New: __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ not defined on
 powerpc64le-linux
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:56:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-99708-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:56:19 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99708

            Bug ID: 99708
           Summary: __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ not defined on powerpc64le-linux
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

For consistency with other targets, I think the rs6000 backend should prede=
fine
__SIZEOF_FLOAT128__ 16
__SIZEOF_IBM128__ 16
__SIZEOF_IEEE128__ 16
macros (each of them whenever __float128, __ibm128 or __ieee128 can be used
given the current ABI and ISA options etc.).
E.g. i386 backend has in i386-c.c

  cpp_define_formatted (parse_in, "__SIZEOF_FLOAT80__=3D%d",
                        GET_MODE_SIZE (XFmode));

  cpp_define (parse_in, "__SIZEOF_FLOAT128__=3D16");

Seems rs6000 predefines __FLOAT128__ macro instead when __float128 can be u=
sed
and  __FLOAT128_TYPE__ when __ibm128 and __ieee128 can be used.=