public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99744] __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't work with GPR intrinsics
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:15:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99744-4-Ft4g5GShsd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99744-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like the same thing as PR98209.  Basically, that for always_inline we
don't know whether the implicitly set target/optimization flags (inherited from
command line rather than from explicit target pragmas or optimize/target
attributes) must be matched in the caller or not.  And we don't really track
what was from the command line and what was overridden.
For some functions we don't really care and want to inline them always no
matter if there are any optimize/target differences (e.g. the various glibc
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE* functions), in other functions we care about the explicit
but not implicit flags, and in yet other we care about everything.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24  2:58 [Bug target/99744] New: " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-03-24  9:16 ` [Bug target/99744] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-24  9:47 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2021-03-24 11:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-03-24 17:58 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-03-25 12:37 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-25 12:43 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-03-25 14:00 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-03-30 13:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-10 13:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 11:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28  7:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-05 13:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-06  1:45 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-08-25 12:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-25 13:06 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-03-15 10:56 ` poulhies at adacore dot com
2022-03-15 14:25 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-03-15 14:32 ` poulhies at adacore dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99744-4-Ft4g5GShsd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).