From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 16926385140C; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:55:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 16926385140C
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBsdG8vOTk4MjhdIGlubGluaW5nIGZhaWxlZCBpbiBjYWxs?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IHRvIOKAmGFsd2F5c19pbmxpbmXigJkg4oCYbWVtY3B54oCZOiAtLXBhcmFt?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IG1heC1pbmxpbmUtaW5zbnMtYXV0byBsaW1pdCByZWFjaGVk?=
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:55:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-99828-4-TSpVWFztBB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99828-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99828-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:55:04 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99828

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic,
                   |                            |missed-optimization

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The issue is that we do not "merge" the attributes and the memcpy
definition lacks the always_inline attribute, somehow
expand_call_inline then picks up the decl with the attribute set.

I'd argue the 1.i TU is clearly invalid in taking the address of memcpy,
but we don't diagnose this.

How we manage to pick up the attribute in 3.i during WPA / LTRANS remains t=
o be
analyzed.  But the "fix" is in the kernel.=