From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5A84C389043A; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:35:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5A84C389043A
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/99850] [P1102R2] reject valid lambda syntax in C++23
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:35:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99850-4-41SyQT3asu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99850-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99850-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:35:16 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99850

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:784de5292c34e287c848b382b431599b818ea76e

commit r11-8210-g784de5292c34e287c848b382b431599b818ea76e
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 16 09:34:26 2021 +0200

    c++: Fix up C++23 [] <...> requires primary -> type {} parsing [PR99850]

    The requires clause parsing has code to suggest users wrapping
    non-primary expressions in (), so if it e.g. parses a primary expression
    and sees it is followed by ++, --, ., ( or -> among other things it
    will try to reparse it as assignment expression or what and if that wor=
ks
    suggests wrapping it inside of parens.
    When it is requires-clause that is after <typename T> etc. it already
    has an exception from that as ( can occur in valid C++20 expression the=
re
    - starting the parameters of the lambda.
    In C++23 another case can occur, as the parameters with the ()s can be
    omitted, requires C can be followed immediately by -> which starts a
    trailing return type.  Even in that case, we don't want to parse that
    as C->...

    2021-04-16  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c++/99850
            * parser.c (cp_parser_constraint_requires_parens) <case CPP_DER=
EF>:
            If lambda_p, return pce_ok instead of pce_maybe_postfix.

            * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-specifiers2.C: New test.=