public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/99861] [modules] ICE in hashtab_chk_error Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:05:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-99861-4-7is6l27OPF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-99861-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99861 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Lelyakin <alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com> --- The same happens with the ICE in add_mergeable_specialization, PR99948, http://lelyakin.de/modules/in%20add_mergeable_specialization/016_7ae8737cc3d793d796faedfe5de5d89d42b966b5/ After adding parameter --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000 the error was transformed to: hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values with a different hash value In file included from /usr/local/include/c++/11.0.1/memory:68, from /usr/local/include/c++/11.0.1/regex:45: /usr/local/include/c++/11.0.1/bits/stl_raw_storage_iter.h: In destructor ‘constexpr std::allocator< <template-parameter-1-1> >::~allocator() [with _Tp = char32_t]’: /usr/local/include/c++/11.0.1/bits/stl_raw_storage_iter.h:95:58: internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 95 | std::_Construct(std::__addressof(*_M_iter), std::move(__element)); | ^~~~ 0x92f671 hashtab_chk_error() ../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.c:137 0xb3ec35 hash_table<spec_hasher, false, xcallocator>::verify(spec_entry* const&, unsigned int) ../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:1033 0xb3f1be hash_table<spec_hasher, false, xcallocator>::find_slot_with_hash(spec_entry* const&, unsigned int, insert_option) ../../gcc/gcc/hash-table.h:968 0xafbd2b match_mergeable_specialization(bool, spec_entry*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:30034 0xa74e18 trees_in::key_mergeable(int, merge_kind, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:10670 0xa78a14 trees_in::decl_value() ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:7903 0xa71877 trees_in::tree_node(bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:9153 0xa77e9b module_state::read_cluster(unsigned int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:14811 0xa7839d module_state::load_section(unsigned int, binding_slot*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18082 0xa7845f module_state::lazy_load(unsigned int, binding_slot*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18740 0xa726e0 trees_in::tree_node(bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:9664 0xa77b9b module_state::read_cluster(unsigned int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:14717 0xa7839d module_state::load_section(unsigned int, binding_slot*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18082 0xa7845f module_state::lazy_load(unsigned int, binding_slot*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18740 0xa726e0 trees_in::tree_node(bool) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:9664 0xa77b9b module_state::read_cluster(unsigned int) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:14717 0xa7839d module_state::load_section(unsigned int, binding_slot*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18082 0xa7845f module_state::lazy_load(unsigned int, binding_slot*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18740 0xa7b5b7 lazy_load_pendings(tree_node*) ../../gcc/gcc/cp/module.cc:18833 0xa83d58 maybe_lazily_declare ../../gcc/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c:1912 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. However this parameter significantly slows compilation. And already two weeks this report remains unassigned...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 13:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-01 4:51 [Bug c++/99861] New: " alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com 2021-04-01 7:49 ` [Bug c++/99861] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-01 7:50 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-05 11:20 ` alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com 2021-04-09 16:28 ` alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com 2021-04-15 17:15 ` alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com 2021-04-16 7:19 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-16 11:44 ` alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com 2021-04-16 11:52 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-16 12:35 ` alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com 2021-04-16 13:05 ` alexander.lelyakin at googlemail dot com [this message] 2021-12-30 16:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-30 16:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-30 16:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-30 16:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-01 4:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-99861-4-7is6l27OPF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).