public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99881] Regression compare -O2 -ftree-vectorize with -O2 on SKX/CLX
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 02:48:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-99881-4-C8wujU55GD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-99881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99881

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu <liuhongt@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:872da9a6f664a06d73c987aa0cb2e5b830158a10

commit r12-2549-g872da9a6f664a06d73c987aa0cb2e5b830158a10
Author: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 26 10:56:47 2021 +0800

    Add the member integer_to_sse to processor_cost as a cost simulation for
movd/pinsrd. It will be used to calculate the cost of vec_construct.

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            PR target/99881
            * config/i386/i386.h (processor_costs): Add new member
            integer_to_sse.
            * config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h (ix86_size_cost, i386_cost,
            i486_cost, pentium_cost, lakemont_cost, pentiumpro_cost,
            geode_cost, k6_cost, athlon_cost, k8_cost, amdfam10_cost,
            bdver_cost, znver1_cost, znver2_cost, znver3_cost,
            btver1_cost, btver2_cost, btver3_cost, pentium4_cost,
            nocona_cost, atom_cost, atom_cost, slm_cost, intel_cost,
            generic_cost, core_cost): Initialize integer_to_sse same value
            as sse_op.
            (skylake_cost): Initialize integer_to_sse twice as much as sse_op.
            * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_builtin_vectorization_cost):
            Use integer_to_sse instead of sse_op to calculate the cost of
            vec_construct.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR target/99881
            * gcc.target/i386/pr99881.c: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28  2:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-02  3:49 [Bug target/99881] New: " crazylht at gmail dot com
2021-04-02 14:29 ` [Bug target/99881] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-04-02 19:34 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2021-04-06  7:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-06 10:06 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2021-04-06 11:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-28  2:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-07-28  2:49 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2021-07-28 22:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-29  1:09 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2021-07-29  2:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-19  2:32 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-02-22  7:59 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-22  8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-99881-4-C8wujU55GD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).