From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2B15C388E82F; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:47:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B15C388E82F
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/99881] Regression compare -O2 -ftree-vectorize with -O2
 on SKX/CLX
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:47:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-99881-4-WiUV3xewfp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:47:17 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99881

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The testcase is buggy:
Executing on host: /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj19/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj19/gcc/
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr99881.c=20=20=20
-fdiagnostics-plain-output  -Ofa
st -march=3Dskylake -ffat-lto-objects -fno-ident -S -o pr99881.s    (timeou=
t =3D
300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj19/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj19/gcc/
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr99881.c
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -Ofast
 -march=3Dskylake -ffat-lto-objects -fno-ident -S -o pr99881.s
PASS: gcc.target/i386/pr99881.c (test for excess errors)
ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "0-9" does not exist.
The error code is TCL LOOKUP COMMAND 0-9
The info on the error is:
invalid command name "0-9"
    while executing
"::tcl_unknown 0-9"
    ("uplevel" body line 1)
    invoked from within
"uplevel 1 ::tcl_unknown $args"


xmm[0-9] should be xmm\[0-9]=