From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5658A389683E; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:26:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5658A389683E From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:26:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:26:35 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99920 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 7 Apr 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99920 >=20 > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Built r152973 ../configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=3Dc,c++= , > installed and built gcc trunk with that as system compiler and can't repr= oduce > it. Maybe some SUSE patches or the SUSE compiler was configured a differ= ent > way... This is the SLES11 system compiler (the last BE SLES). It's configured with --with-cpu=3Dpower4 --enable-secureplt --with-long-double-128. We do have a patch with power7 enablement (but just recognizing the command-line option, nothing else). And yes, lots of more cobbled up patches (and we never updated to a 4.3.6 baseline either). That said, it's a bit too short notice to start digging into this myself and honestly if FSF 4.3.4 and 4.3.6 are not affected I'd not worry (and instead I'll see to fixing SLE11 instead if the need arises). SLE11 also has access to GCC 4.8.5 btw. (just with binaries inconveniently named gcc-4.8).=