From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7228E3844041; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:02:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7228E3844041 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/99927] [11 Regression] Maybe wrong code since r11-39-gf9e1ea10e657af9f Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:02:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:02:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99927 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Before combine it looks fine: (insn 23 22 105 6 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 108) (udiv:SI (reg:SI 104) (reg/v:SI 102 [ var_6 ]))) (set (reg:SI 107) (umod:SI (reg:SI 104) (reg/v:SI 102 [ var_6 ]))) (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags)) ]) "pr99927.c":13:24 449 {*udivmodsi4} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 104) (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:SI 108) (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags) (nil))))) (insn 105 23 106 6 (set (reg:QI 135) (const_int 1 [0x1])) "pr99927.c":13:24 77 {*movqi_internal} (nil)) (insn 106 105 107 6 (parallel [ (set (reg:QI 134) (and:QI (subreg:QI (reg:SI 107) 0) (const_int 1 [0x1]))) (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags)) ]) "pr99927.c":13:24 491 {*andqi_1} (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags) (nil))) (insn 107 106 108 6 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (compare:CCZ (reg:SI 107) (const_int 0 [0]))) "pr99927.c":13:24 7 {*cmpsi_ccno_1} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 107) (nil))) (insn 108 107 111 6 (set (reg:QI 96 [ var_lsm_flag.12 ]) (if_then_else:QI (eq (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (const_int 0 [0])) (reg:QI 134) (reg:QI 135))) "pr99927.c":13:24 1104 {*movqicc_noc} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:QI 134) (nil))) but in combine dump there is: (insn 23 22 105 6 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 108) (udiv:SI (reg:SI 104) (reg/v:SI 102 [ var_6 ]))) (set (reg:SI 107) (umod:SI (reg:SI 104) (reg/v:SI 102 [ var_6 ]))) (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags)) ]) "pr99927.c":13:24 449 {*udivmodsi4} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 104) (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:SI 108) (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags) (nil))))) (note 105 23 106 6 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (note 106 105 107 6 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (insn 107 106 108 6 (set (reg:QI 135) (const_int 1 [0x1])) "pr99927.c":13:24 77 {*movqi_internal} (nil)) (note 108 107 111 6 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (insn 111 108 85 6 (set (reg:QI 96 [ var_lsm_flag.12 ]) (if_then_else:QI (eq (reg:CCZ 17 flags) (const_int 0 [0])) (subreg:QI (reg:SI 107) 0) (reg:QI 135))) "pr99927.c":13:24 1104 {*movqicc_noc} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 107) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:QI 135) (nil))))=