From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C54583846078; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:02:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C54583846078 From: "mike.robins at talktalk dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/99937] New: Optimization needed for ARM with single cycle multiplier Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:02:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mike.robins at talktalk dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:02:36 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99937 Bug ID: 99937 Summary: Optimization needed for ARM with single cycle multiplier Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mike.robins at talktalk dot net Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50512 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D50512&action=3Dedit Source file(s) I am cross-compiling using "arm-none-eabi-gcc -mcpu=3Dcortex-m0plus -Wall -= Wextra -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O3 -S foobar.c" for a target architecture that performs a multiply in a single cycle, using gcc version 10.2.0 on a PC run= ning Fedora Linux. Is there an option to persuade the compiler to use the multiply instruction automatically instead of shifts and adds when multiplying by a constant? In the example code attached, gcc uses the trick of multiplying by a big nu= mber instead of dividing by a small one (12 in this case). For my target, the co= de from "-O3" is both longer and slower then that for "-Os".=