From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7F42A3858C62; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:07:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7F42A3858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689102445;
	bh=1OhA+Lcalw6wNnTDc/cJS38iYGHVbgTOdofwfnAer44=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wPpAbcDhZbOFl8jaABkPqaC4YSFZbrhXHU8FXBs+ElSgtA9/EH045Brjp56ueVJhg
	 WhVkkDUc8EHkbRkiIBUpJKGFnwHuIF5fns0QPwHRZKVw0UaHIrAm2ytrqNLEbTwV7N
	 lcPhkCkb2O43Ywa02AUsn8bRHmlGdO6gYGs0mlq0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/99945] missing maybe-uninitialized warning
 when using nested function vs SRA
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:07:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99945-4-BhoCyCW3EF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99945-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99945-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99945

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note basically -fsanitize=3Dundefined in this case stops SRA from happening=
 ...=