From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 70DD03894C3D; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 07:33:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 70DD03894C3D From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/99946] fail to exchange if conditions in terms of likely/unlikely probability Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 07:33:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 07:33:11 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99946 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |missed-optimization Last reconfirmed| |2021-04-07 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- There's no pass doing all of this. There's ifcombine that could end up turning it into tem =3D likely(a>0) & unlikely(b>0); if (tem) g (); and then RTL expansion might expand it to branchy code again. But of course __builtin_expect is long gone then and we'll lose the likelyness of the individual tests. Still ifcombine has analysis logic as to "collecting" a complex predicate, what's then missing is to "re-associate" the tests according to probability. Which means implementing it in ifcombine should be feasible.=