From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1FF60399C021; Fri,  9 Apr 2021 15:15:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1FF60399C021
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBsaWJzdGRjKysvOTk5ODVdIFs5LzEwLzExIFJlZ3Jlc3Np?=
 =?UTF-8?B?b25dIGJpdHMvaGFzaHRhYmxlLmg6NDgzOjk6IGVycm9yOiBib2R5IG9mIA==?=
 =?UTF-8?B?4oCYY29uc3RleHBy4oCZIGZ1bmN0aW9uIC4uLiBub3QgYSByZXR1cm4tc3Rh?=
 =?UTF-8?B?dGVtZW50IHNpbmNlIGc6MWNiYmE0OWUzNDE3ZDliMDY2MWU3MDMwMWQ2ZmI3?=
 =?UTF-8?B?YTdmNTJmZDM2MA==?=
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:15:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-99985-4-gsqhASkCfk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-99985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-99985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:15:05 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99985

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
<redi@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:637418ec2c6f559d4fac074db3bafc34a728484b

commit r10-9679-g637418ec2c6f559d4fac074db3bafc34a728484b
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 9 12:05:39 2021 +0100

    libstdc++: Fix invalid constexpr function in C++11 mode [PR 99985]

    I keep forgetting that a constexpr function in C++11 has to be a single
    return statement.

    libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

            PR libstdc++/99985
            * include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::_S_nothrow_move()): Fix
            to be a valid constexpr function in C++11.
            * testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/99985.cc: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit 40ccb47b505b528244ee305923681c0ae3b6f4d5)=