public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/99989] [11 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning breaks bootstrap on riscv64 Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:48:32 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-99989-4-oodQa4TLW6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-99989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99989 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e350d8539a4e28ddc30d0f08a4040f10b699135 commit r11-8107-g3e350d8539a4e28ddc30d0f08a4040f10b699135 Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Date: Sat Apr 10 12:48:04 2021 +0200 gimple-ssa-warn-alloca: Always initialize limit [PR99989] This PR is about a -W*uninitialized warning on riscv64. alloca_type_and_limit is documented to have limit member only defined when type is ALLOCA_BOUND_MAYBE_LARGE or ALLOCA_BOUND_DEFINITELY_LARGE and otherwise just default constructs limit, which for wide_int means no initialization at all. IMHO it is fine not to use the limit member otherwise, but trying to not initialize it when it can be e.g. copied around and then invoke UB doesn't look like a good idea. 2021-04-10 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR middle-end/99989 * gimple-ssa-warn-alloca.c (alloca_type_and_limit::alloca_type_and_limit): Initialize limit to 0 with integer precision unconditionally.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-10 10:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-09 10:16 [Bug middle-end/99989] New: [11 regression] False maybe-uninitialized " schwab@linux-m68k.org 2021-04-09 10:17 ` [Bug middle-end/99989] " schwab@linux-m68k.org 2021-04-09 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-09 10:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-09 10:47 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-09 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-09 10:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-09 15:57 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-09 17:50 ` [Bug middle-end/99989] [11 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-10 10:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-04-10 10:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-10 11:07 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-99989-4-oodQa4TLW6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).