From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-163086-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6471 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 12:48:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6322 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2005 12:48:29 -0000
Received: from bethe.phy.uc.edu (HELO bethe.phy.uc.edu) (129.137.4.14)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:48:29 +0000
Received: from [172.30.13.108] (zhivago.erc-wireless.uc.edu [172.30.13.108])
	by bethe.phy.uc.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9LCmRt7001410;
	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:48:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20051021111326.7621.qmail@sourceware.org>
References: <bug-24257-8707@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> <20051021111326.7621.qmail@sourceware.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <f56d18421f003acefcd53f72ab03e9eb@physics.uc.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/24257] [4.1 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn with -O -fgcse -fgcse-sm
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:48:00 -0000
To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -100 () USER_IN_WHITELIST
X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg02784.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:13 AM, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> pinskia, what do you think: Keep this marked as a regression, or not?


I think it should be kept as a regression.  Otherwise it will get
overlooked before it is time to turn on store motion.

-- Pinski