From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15549 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 06:40:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15531 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 06:40:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO uniton.integrable-solutions.net) (62.212.99.186) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 06:40:56 -0000 Received: from uniton.integrable-solutions.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i2Q6Tg9b018819; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:29:42 +0100 Received: (from gdr@localhost) by uniton.integrable-solutions.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id i2Q6Tgbp018818; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:29:42 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: uniton.integrable-solutions.net: gdr set sender to gdr@integrable-solutions.net using -f To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug c++/13294] [3.4/3.5 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations References: <20031204043712.13294.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org> <20040325221242.10458.qmail@sources.redhat.com> From: Gabriel Dos Reis In-Reply-To: <20040325221242.10458.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Organization: Integrable Solutions Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg03085.txt.bz2 List-Id: "jason at redhat dot com" writes: | This patch seems to implement the desired behavior, which IIRC was to use | the specialization context for specializations of namespace-scope class | templates, but use the template context in all other cases. Testing now. That looks to me to be the desired behaviour. Benjamin? -- gaby