public inbox for gcc-cvs-wwwdocs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Sebor <msebor@sourceware.org> To: gcc-cvs-wwwdocs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. 5a57e261bcfbb7691901bdf219ba114b449b690e Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:45:24 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210210004524.AD1963858D29@sourceware.org> (raw) This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gcc-wwwdocs". The branch, master has been updated via 5a57e261bcfbb7691901bdf219ba114b449b690e (commit) from cf0d4e41a94bae204a8c5d2490063d58cdb1d4e3 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- commit 5a57e261bcfbb7691901bdf219ba114b449b690e Author: Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com> Date: Tue Feb 9 17:40:01 2021 -0700 Move -Wtsan under New Warnings. Add more links to the user manual. diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html index 80d39b73..de75b8d6 100644 --- a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html +++ b/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html @@ -174,7 +174,8 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> <ul> <li>New attributes: <ul> - <li>The <code>no_stack_protector</code> attribute has been added to mark functions which should not be instrumented + <li>The <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-no_005fstack_005fprotector-function-attribute"><code>no_stack_protector</code></a> + attribute has been added to mark functions which should not be instrumented with stack protection (<code>-fstack-protector</code>).</li> <li>The existing <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-malloc-function-attribute"><code>malloc</code></a> @@ -205,6 +206,10 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> GCC releases most instances of his warning are diagnosed by <code>-Wstringop-overflow</code>. </li> + <li><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wtsan"><code>-Wtsan</code></a>, + enabled by default, warns about unsupported features in ThreadSanitizer + (currently <code>std::atomic_thread_fence</code>). + </li> </ul> </li> <li>Enhancements to existing warnings: @@ -238,8 +243,6 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> This functionality requires Binutils version 2.36 or later. </p> </li> - <li>A new warning <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wtsan"><code>-Wtsan</code></a>, enabled by default, - warns about unsupported features in ThreadSanitizer (currently <code>std::atomic_thread_fence</code>).</li> <li>A series of conditional expressions that compare the same variable can be transformed into a switch statement if each of them contains a comparison expression. Example: <pre> @@ -376,19 +379,23 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> (<a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/PR97518">PR97518</a>).</li> <li>New warnings: <ul> - <li><code>-Wctad-maybe-unsupported</code>, disabled by default, warns + <li><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wctad-maybe-unsupported"><code>-Wctad-maybe-unsupported</code></a>, + disabled by default, warns about performing class template argument deduction on a type with no deduction guides. </li> - <li><code>-Wrange-loop-construct</code>, enabled by <code>-Wall</code>, + <li><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wrange-loop-construct"><code>-Wrange-loop-construct</code></a>, + enabled by <code>-Wall</code>, warns when a range-based for-loop is creating unnecessary and expensive copies. </li> - <li><code>-Wdeprecated-enum-enum-conversion</code>, enabled by default in + <li><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wdeprecated-enum-enum-conversion"><code>-Wdeprecated-enum-enum-conversion</code></a>, + enabled by default in C++20, warns about deprecated arithmetic conversions on operands of enumeration types, as outlined in <em>[depr.arith.conv.enum]</em>. </li> - <li><code>-Wdeprecated-enum-float-conversion</code>, enabled by default in + <li><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wdeprecated-enum-float-conversion"><code>-Wdeprecated-enum-float-conversion</code></a>, + enabled by default in C++20, warns about deprecated arithmetic conversions on operands where one is of enumeration type and the other is of a floating-point type, as outlined in <em>[depr.arith.conv.enum]</em>. @@ -399,7 +406,8 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> forms of <code>operator new</code> or from other mismatched allocation functions. </li> - <li><code>-Wvexing-parse</code>, enabled by default, warns about the most + <li><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wvexing-parse"><code>-Wvexing-parse</code></a>, + enabled by default, warns about the most vexing parse rule: the cases when a declaration looks like a variable definition, but the C++ language requires it to be interpreted as a function declaration. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) hooks/post-receive -- gcc-wwwdocs
reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 0:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210210004524.AD1963858D29@sourceware.org \ --to=msebor@sourceware.org \ --cc=gcc-cvs-wwwdocs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).