public inbox for gcc-cvs-wwwdocs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. 3be1a28f58d6063258407b0751e8fb55df4749c8
@ 2022-03-30 11:16 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2022-03-30 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs-wwwdocs

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gcc-wwwdocs".

The branch, master has been updated
       via  3be1a28f58d6063258407b0751e8fb55df4749c8 (commit)
      from  caa5dc6995aac2c7dc1a139e1a021927faaf73eb (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 3be1a28f58d6063258407b0751e8fb55df4749c8
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 30 13:16:18 2022 +0200

    Document zero width bitfield ABI changes.

diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
index 689feeba..f82f1a97 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html
@@ -28,6 +28,31 @@ a work-in-progress.</p>
 <!-- .................................................................. -->
 <h2>Caveats</h2>
 <ul>
+  <li>
+    An <a name="zero_width_bitfields">ABI</a> incompatibility between C and
+    C++ when passing or returning by value certain aggregates containing zero
+    width bit-fields has been discovered on various targets.
+    As mentioned in <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/PR102024">PR102024</a>,
+    since the <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/PR42217">PR42217</a> fix in
+    GCC 4.5 the C++ front-end has been removing zero width bit-fields
+    from the internal representation of the aggregates after the layout of those
+    aggregates, but the C front-end kept them, so passing e.g.
+    <code>struct S { float a; int : 0; float b; }</code> or
+    <code>struct T { float c; int : 0; }</code> by value could differ
+    between C and C++.  Starting with GCC 12 the C++ front-end no longer
+    removes those bit-fields from the internal representation and
+    per clarified psABI some targets have been changed, so that they
+    either ignore those bit-fields in the argument passing by value
+    decisions in both C and C++, or they always take them into account.
+    x86-64, ARM and AArch64 will always ignore them (so there is
+    a C ABI incompatibility between GCC 11 and earlier with GCC 12 or
+    later), PowerPC64 ELFv2 and S/390 always take them into account
+    (so there is a C++ ABI incompatibility, GCC 4.4 and earlier compatible
+    with GCC 12 or later, incompatible with GCC 4.5 through GCC 11).
+    RISC-V has changed the handling of these already starting with GCC 10.
+    GCC 12 on the above targets will report such incompatibilities as
+    warnings or other diagnostics unless <code>-Wno-psabi</code> is used.
+  </li>
   <li>
     <strong>C:</strong>
     Computed gotos require a pointer type now.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)


hooks/post-receive
-- 
gcc-wwwdocs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-03-30 11:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-30 11:16 gcc-wwwdocs branch master updated. 3be1a28f58d6063258407b0751e8fb55df4749c8 Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).