public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-08-28 20:09 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-08-28 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5689da8bf0d79d8effd67e75781fb129e6914963
commit 5689da8bf0d79d8effd67e75781fb129e6914963
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-10-29 19:52 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-10-29 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d62f178a3f084fc8810d0f566bae420b5e905ba3
commit d62f178a3f084fc8810d0f566bae420b5e905ba3
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-10-27 16:29 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-10-27 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b5ce588284f54635baa3b97838485d603f92392
commit 1b5ce588284f54635baa3b97838485d603f92392
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-09-16 21:31 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-09-16 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a387781bb818deb720b28ff92c844d1a1b20db99
commit a387781bb818deb720b28ff92c844d1a1b20db99
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-09-14 13:59 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-09-14 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e897ef7cc8564a06a49014764c533e52b67e5f35
commit e897ef7cc8564a06a49014764c533e52b67e5f35
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-08-20 16:40 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-08-20 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ed2c8fbdbf2b9022174d60b30f872d228f9c99d
commit 3ed2c8fbdbf2b9022174d60b30f872d228f9c99d
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-08-18 18:46 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-08-18 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1cdfe6ba22261f231d8af77734185733aa3ce7c
commit d1cdfe6ba22261f231d8af77734185733aa3ce7c
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments
@ 2020-07-31 18:13 William Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Schmidt @ 2020-07-31 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07e82f78fb2191f89fda389b3775b14bce38ecc2
commit 07e82f78fb2191f89fda389b3775b14bce38ecc2
Author: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Jul 31 13:13:26 2020 -0500
rs6000: Fix typos in comments
2020-07-31 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin-new.def: Correct typos.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
index ce2e3c2476b..b6a1830c093 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@
XXBRW_V4SI p9_xxbrw_v4si {}
-; Miscellaneour P9 functions
+; Miscellaneous P9 functions
[power9]
signed long long __builtin_darn ();
DARN darn {}
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@
; MASK_POWERPC64. For xsxexpdp, this seems to be fine for 32-bit,
; because the result will always fit in 32 bits and the return
; value is SImode; but the pattern currently requires TARGET_64BIT.
-; On the other hand, xsssigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
+; On the other hand, xsxsigdp has a result that doesn't fit in
; 32 bits, and the return value is DImode, so it seems that
; TARGET_64BIT (actually TARGET_POWERPC64) is justified. TBD. ####
[power9-64]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-29 19:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-28 20:09 [gcc(refs/users/wschmidt/heads/builtins3)] rs6000: Fix typos in comments William Schmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-29 19:52 William Schmidt
2020-10-27 16:29 William Schmidt
2020-09-16 21:31 William Schmidt
2020-09-14 13:59 William Schmidt
2020-08-20 16:40 William Schmidt
2020-08-18 18:46 William Schmidt
2020-07-31 18:13 William Schmidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).