public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc(refs/users/aoliva/heads/testme)] add -mfloat128 to __float128-using test missing it Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:25:32 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210309212532.98D3B3893660@sourceware.org> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54a39afdf8edcbb82cdd3cfd26edc1f6d3c6a5dd commit 54a39afdf8edcbb82cdd3cfd26edc1f6d3c6a5dd Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com> Date: Mon Mar 8 23:22:51 2021 -0300 add -mfloat128 to __float128-using test missing it Most (all?) powerpc tests that use the __float128 type either enable it with -mfloat128, or use effective target requirements to check for its presence. prefix-ds-dq.c is failing in some of our configurations because it uses the __float128 type without checking for it, or enabling it explicitly. Since it's a compile test, I'm enabling it explicitly. for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog * gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c: Enable __float128. Diff: --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c index 554cd0c1bea..6517eadf44c 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/prefix-ds-dq.c @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */ -/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power10" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power10 -mfloat128" } */ +/* { dg-prune-output ".-mfloat128. option may not be fully supported" } */ /* Tests whether we generate a prefixed load/store operation for addresses that don't meet DS/DQ offset constraints. 64-bit is needed for testing the use
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 21:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-09 21:25 Alexandre Oliva [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2021-03-11 10:21 Alexandre Oliva 2021-03-09 21:47 Alexandre Oliva 2021-03-09 2:26 Alexandre Oliva
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210309212532.98D3B3893660@sourceware.org \ --to=aoliva@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).