From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 1130) id 3F2113972830; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:07:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3F2113972830 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Richard Sandiford To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc r11-8183] Better const_vector printing X-Act-Checkin: gcc X-Git-Author: Richard Sandiford X-Git-Refname: refs/heads/master X-Git-Oldrev: 00a2774923c1dc5666cd26bb9b8c37b1b7dd689d X-Git-Newrev: 1fce5932a3af575cd02c1d2b786dd1b39b922ebe Message-Id: <20210414190700.3F2113972830@sourceware.org> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:07:00 +0000 (GMT) X-BeenThere: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-cvs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:07:00 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fce5932a3af575cd02c1d2b786dd1b39b922ebe commit r11-8183-g1fce5932a3af575cd02c1d2b786dd1b39b922ebe Author: Richard Sandiford Date: Wed Apr 14 20:06:44 2021 +0100 Better const_vector printing Looking at PR99929 showed that we weren't dumping enough information about variable-length CONST_VECTORs. Something like: (const_vector:VNx4SI [(const_int 1) (const_int 0)]) could be either: (a) 1, 0, 1, 0, repeating (b) 1 followed by all zeros This patch adds more information to the dumps. There are four cases: (a) above: (const_vector:VNx4SI repeat [ (const_int 1) (const_int 0) ]) (b) above: (const_vector:VNx4SI [ (const_int 1) repeat [ (const_int 0) ] ]) a single stepped sequence: (const_vector:VNx4SI [ (const_int 0) stepped [ (const_int 1) (const_int 2) ] ]) interleaved stepped sequences: (const_vector:VNx4SI [ (const_int 0) (const_int 40) stepped (interleave 2) [ (const_int 1) (const_int 41) (const_int 2) (const_int 42) ] ]) There are probably better syntaxes, but hopefully this is at least an improvement on the status quo. gcc/ * print-rtl.c (rtx_writer::print_rtx_operand_codes_E_and_V): Print more information about variable-length CONST_VECTORs. Diff: --- gcc/print-rtl.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/print-rtl.c b/gcc/print-rtl.c index c7982bce507..081fc50fab8 100644 --- a/gcc/print-rtl.c +++ b/gcc/print-rtl.c @@ -370,6 +370,10 @@ rtx_writer::print_rtx_operand_codes_E_and_V (const_rtx in_rtx, int idx) print_rtx_head, m_indent * 2, ""); m_sawclose = 0; } + if (GET_CODE (in_rtx) == CONST_VECTOR + && !GET_MODE_NUNITS (GET_MODE (in_rtx)).is_constant () + && CONST_VECTOR_DUPLICATE_P (in_rtx)) + fprintf (m_outfile, " repeat"); fputs (" [", m_outfile); if (XVEC (in_rtx, idx) != NULL) { @@ -377,12 +381,32 @@ rtx_writer::print_rtx_operand_codes_E_and_V (const_rtx in_rtx, int idx) if (XVECLEN (in_rtx, idx)) m_sawclose = 1; + int barrier = XVECLEN (in_rtx, idx); + if (GET_CODE (in_rtx) == CONST_VECTOR + && !GET_MODE_NUNITS (GET_MODE (in_rtx)).is_constant ()) + barrier = CONST_VECTOR_NPATTERNS (in_rtx); + for (int j = 0; j < XVECLEN (in_rtx, idx); j++) { int j1; + if (j == barrier) + { + fprintf (m_outfile, "\n%s%*s", + print_rtx_head, m_indent * 2, ""); + if (!CONST_VECTOR_STEPPED_P (in_rtx)) + fprintf (m_outfile, "repeat ["); + else if (CONST_VECTOR_NPATTERNS (in_rtx) == 1) + fprintf (m_outfile, "stepped ["); + else + fprintf (m_outfile, "stepped (interleave %d) [", + CONST_VECTOR_NPATTERNS (in_rtx)); + m_indent += 2; + } + print_rtx (XVECEXP (in_rtx, idx, j)); - for (j1 = j + 1; j1 < XVECLEN (in_rtx, idx); j1++) + int limit = MIN (barrier, XVECLEN (in_rtx, idx)); + for (j1 = j + 1; j1 < limit; j1++) if (XVECEXP (in_rtx, idx, j) != XVECEXP (in_rtx, idx, j1)) break; @@ -393,6 +417,12 @@ rtx_writer::print_rtx_operand_codes_E_and_V (const_rtx in_rtx, int idx) } } + if (barrier < XVECLEN (in_rtx, idx)) + { + m_indent -= 2; + fprintf (m_outfile, "\n%s%*s]", print_rtx_head, m_indent * 2, ""); + } + m_indent -= 2; } if (m_sawclose)