public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc(refs/users/aoliva/heads/testme)] harden conditional branches
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 04:50:05 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210918045005.14FE33857C5D@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48580950aaba226d1b180186664f72405496fcc7

commit 48580950aaba226d1b180186664f72405496fcc7
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date:   Wed Sep 15 14:00:47 2021 -0300

    harden conditional branches

Diff:
---
 gcc/Makefile.in                   |   1 +
 gcc/common.opt                    |  10 +
 gcc/doc/invoke.texi               |  19 ++
 gcc/gimple-harden-conditionals.cc | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/passes.def                    |   2 +
 gcc/tree-pass.h                   |   3 +
 6 files changed, 428 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
index b8229adf580..911d095601f 100644
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@ -1389,6 +1389,7 @@ OBJS = \
 	gimple-if-to-switch.o \
 	gimple-iterator.o \
 	gimple-fold.o \
+	gimple-harden-conditionals.o \
 	gimple-laddress.o \
 	gimple-loop-interchange.o \
 	gimple-loop-jam.o \
diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
index b921f5e3b25..6c0fa691063 100644
--- a/gcc/common.opt
+++ b/gcc/common.opt
@@ -1719,6 +1719,16 @@ fguess-branch-probability
 Common Var(flag_guess_branch_prob) Optimization
 Enable guessing of branch probabilities.
 
+; ??? Do NOT enable by default
+fharden-compares
+Common Var(flag_harden_compares) Optimization Init(1)
+Harden conditionals not used in branches, checking reversed conditions.
+
+; ??? Do NOT enable by default
+fharden-conditional-branches
+Common Var(flag_harden_conditional_branches) Optimization Init(1)
+Harden conditional branches by checking reversed conditions.
+
 ; Nonzero means ignore `#ident' directives.  0 means handle them.
 ; Generate position-independent code for executables if possible
 ; On SVR4 targets, it also controls whether or not to emit a
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 78cfc100ac2..84bbf1c7113 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
 -fasan-shadow-offset=@var{number}  -fsanitize-sections=@var{s1},@var{s2},... @gol
 -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error  -fbounds-check @gol
 -fcf-protection=@r{[}full@r{|}branch@r{|}return@r{|}none@r{|}check@r{]} @gol
+-fharden-compares -fharden-conditional-branches @gol
 -fstack-protector  -fstack-protector-all  -fstack-protector-strong @gol
 -fstack-protector-explicit  -fstack-check @gol
 -fstack-limit-register=@var{reg}  -fstack-limit-symbol=@var{sym} @gol
@@ -15487,6 +15488,24 @@ which functions and calls should be skipped from instrumentation
 Currently the x86 GNU/Linux target provides an implementation based
 on Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
 
+@item -fharden-compares
+@opindex fharden-compares
+For every logical test that survives gimple optimizations and is
+@emph{not} the condition in a conditional branch (for example,
+conditions tested for conditional moves, or to store in boolean
+variables), emit extra code to compute and verify the reversed
+condition, and to call @code{__builtin_trap} if the results do not
+match.  Use with @samp{-fharden-conditional-branches} to cover all
+conditionals.
+
+@item -fharden-conditional-branches
+@opindex fharden-conditional-branches
+For every non-vectorized conditional branch that survives gimple
+optimizations, emit extra code to compute and verify the reversed
+condition, and to call @code{__builtin_trap} if the result is
+unexpected.  Use with @samp{-fharden-compares} to cover all
+conditionals.
+
 @item -fstack-protector
 @opindex fstack-protector
 Emit extra code to check for buffer overflows, such as stack smashing
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-harden-conditionals.cc b/gcc/gimple-harden-conditionals.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6e798ada2ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/gimple-harden-conditionals.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,393 @@
+/* Harden conditionals.
+   Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   Contributed by Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>.
+
+This file is part of GCC.
+
+GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
+the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
+Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later
+version.
+
+GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY
+WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
+for more details.
+
+You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
+<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#include "config.h"
+#include "system.h"
+#include "coretypes.h"
+#include "backend.h"
+#include "tree.h"
+#include "fold-const.h"
+#include "gimple.h"
+#include "gimplify.h"
+#include "tree-pass.h"
+#include "ssa.h"
+#include "gimple-iterator.h"
+#include "tree-cfg.h"
+#include "basic-block.h"
+#include "cfghooks.h"
+#include "cfgloop.h"
+#include "diagnostic.h"
+#include "intl.h"
+
+namespace {
+
+/* This pass introduces redundant, but reversed conditionals at every
+   compare, be it used for conditional branches, other conditional
+   operations, or for boolean computation.  This doesn't make sense
+   for abstract CPUs, but this kind of hardening may avoid undesirable
+   execution paths on CPUs under such attacks as of power
+   deprivation.  */
+
+/* Define a pass to harden conditionals other than branches.  */
+const pass_data pass_data_harden_compares = {
+  GIMPLE_PASS,
+  "hardcmp",
+  OPTGROUP_NONE,
+  TV_NONE,
+  PROP_cfg | PROP_ssa, // properties_required
+  0,	    // properties_provided
+  0,	    // properties_destroyed
+  0,	    // properties_start
+  TODO_update_ssa
+  | TODO_cleanup_cfg
+  | TODO_verify_il, // properties_finish
+};
+
+class pass_harden_compares : public gimple_opt_pass
+{
+public:
+  pass_harden_compares (gcc::context *ctxt)
+    : gimple_opt_pass (pass_data_harden_compares, ctxt)
+  {}
+  opt_pass *clone () { return new pass_harden_compares (m_ctxt); }
+  virtual bool gate (function *) {
+    return flag_harden_compares;
+  }
+  virtual unsigned int execute (function *);
+};
+
+/* This pass introduces redundant, but reversed conditionals at every
+   conditional branch.  This doesn't make sense for abstract CPUs, but
+   this kind of hardening may avoid undesirable execution paths on
+   CPUs under such attacks as of power deprivation.  This pass must
+   run after the above, otherwise it will re-harden the checks
+   introduced by the above.  */
+
+/* Define a pass to harden conditionals in branches.  */
+const pass_data pass_data_harden_conditional_branches = {
+  GIMPLE_PASS,
+  "hardcbr",
+  OPTGROUP_NONE,
+  TV_NONE,
+  PROP_cfg | PROP_ssa, // properties_required
+  0,	    // properties_provided
+  0,	    // properties_destroyed
+  0,	    // properties_start
+  TODO_update_ssa
+  | TODO_cleanup_cfg
+  | TODO_verify_il, // properties_finish
+};
+
+class pass_harden_conditional_branches : public gimple_opt_pass
+{
+public:
+  pass_harden_conditional_branches (gcc::context *ctxt)
+    : gimple_opt_pass (pass_data_harden_conditional_branches, ctxt)
+  {}
+  opt_pass *clone () { return new pass_harden_conditional_branches (m_ctxt); }
+  virtual bool gate (function *) {
+    return flag_harden_conditional_branches;
+  }
+  virtual unsigned int execute (function *);
+};
+
+}
+
+static inline tree
+detach_value (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsip, tree val)
+{
+  if (TREE_CONSTANT (val) || TREE_CODE (val) != SSA_NAME)
+    {
+      gcc_checking_assert (is_gimple_min_invariant (val));
+      return val;
+    }
+
+  tree ret = copy_ssa_name (val);
+
+  vec<tree, va_gc> *inputs = NULL;
+  vec<tree, va_gc> *outputs = NULL;
+  vec_safe_push (outputs,
+		 build_tree_list
+		 (build_tree_list
+		  (NULL_TREE, build_string (2, "=g")),
+		  ret));
+  vec_safe_push (inputs,
+		 build_tree_list
+		 (build_tree_list
+		  (NULL_TREE, build_string (1, "0")),
+		  val));
+  gasm *detach = gimple_build_asm_vec ("", inputs, outputs,
+				       NULL, NULL);
+  gsi_insert_before (gsip, detach, GSI_SAME_STMT);
+
+  SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (ret) = detach;
+
+  return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void
+insert_check_and_trap (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsip, int flags,
+		       enum tree_code cop, tree lhs, tree rhs)
+{
+  basic_block chk = gsi_bb (*gsip);
+
+  gcond *cond = gimple_build_cond (cop, lhs, rhs, NULL, NULL);
+  gsi_insert_before (gsip, cond, GSI_SAME_STMT);
+
+  basic_block trp = create_empty_bb (chk);
+
+  gimple_stmt_iterator gsit = gsi_after_labels (trp);
+  gcall *trap = gimple_build_call (builtin_decl_explicit (BUILT_IN_TRAP), 0);
+  gsi_insert_before (&gsit, trap, GSI_SAME_STMT);
+
+  if (BB_PARTITION (chk))
+    BB_SET_PARTITION (trp, BB_COLD_PARTITION);
+
+  int true_false_flag = flags & (EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE);
+  gcc_assert (true_false_flag);
+  int neg_true_false_flag = (~flags) & (EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE);
+
+  /* Make the edge to the trap block the fallthru one, since we don't
+     know where the other block is placed.  */
+  single_succ_edge (chk)->flags |= neg_true_false_flag;
+  single_succ_edge (chk)->flags &= ~EDGE_FALLTHRU;
+  make_edge (chk, trp, true_false_flag | EDGE_FALLTHRU);
+
+  if (dom_info_available_p (CDI_DOMINATORS))
+    set_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, trp, chk);
+  if (current_loops)
+    add_bb_to_loop (trp, current_loops->tree_root);
+}
+
+static inline void
+insert_edge_check_and_trap (edge e, bool fallthru ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+			    enum tree_code cop, tree lhs, tree rhs)
+{
+  int flags = e->flags;
+
+  basic_block chk = split_edge (e);
+  e = NULL;
+
+  gimple_stmt_iterator gsik = gsi_after_labels (chk);
+
+  bool same_p = (lhs == rhs);
+  lhs = detach_value (&gsik, lhs);
+  rhs = same_p ? lhs : detach_value (&gsik, rhs);
+
+  insert_check_and_trap (&gsik, flags, cop, lhs, rhs);
+
+#if 0
+  /* ??? Attempt to improve block placement.  This is fragile, leaving
+     a cond branch without a fallthru edge is prone to breaking the
+     expander.  */
+  if (fallthru)
+    {
+      if (chk->prev_bb != single_pred (chk))
+	move_block_after (chk, single_pred (chk));
+      if (chk->next_bb != FALLTHRU_EDGE (chk)->dest)
+	split_edge (FALLTHRU_EDGE (chk));
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      if (single_pred_p (FALLTHRU_EDGE (chk)->dest))
+	move_block_after (chk, FALLTHRU_EDGE (chk)->dest->prev_bb);
+      else if (chk->next_bb != FALLTHRU_EDGE (chk)->dest)
+	split_edge (FALLTHRU_EDGE (chk));
+    }
+#endif
+
+  gcc_checking_assert (!fallthru || !(flags & EDGE_FALLTHRU)
+		       || chk->prev_bb == single_pred (chk));
+}
+
+unsigned int
+pass_harden_conditional_branches::execute (function *fun)
+{
+  basic_block bb;
+  FOR_EACH_BB_REVERSE_FN (bb, fun)
+    {
+      gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_last_bb (bb);
+
+      if (gsi_end_p (gsi))
+	continue;
+
+      gcond *cond = dyn_cast <gcond *> (gsi_stmt (gsi));
+      if (!cond)
+	continue;
+
+      /* Turn:
+
+	 if (x op y) goto l1; else goto l2;
+
+	 into:
+
+	 if (x op y) goto l1'; else goto l2';
+	 l1': if (x' cop y') goto l1'trap; else goto l1;
+	 l1'trap: __builtin_trap ();
+	 l2': if (x' cop y') goto l2; else goto l2'trap;
+	 l2'trap: __builtin_trap ();
+
+	 where cop is a complementary boolean operation to op; l1', l1'trap,
+	 l2' and l2'trap are newly-created labels; and x' and y' hold the same
+	 value as x and y, but in a way that does not enable the compiler to
+	 optimize the redundant compare away.
+      */
+
+      enum tree_code op = gimple_cond_code (cond);
+      tree lhs = gimple_cond_lhs (cond);
+      tree rhs = gimple_cond_rhs (cond);
+
+      enum tree_code cop = invert_tree_comparison (op, HONOR_NANS (lhs));
+
+      if (cop == ERROR_MARK)
+	/* ??? Can we do better?  */
+	continue;
+
+      /* Each insertion splits one of the edges.  Split the fallthru
+	 edge last, so that it remains fallthru.  */
+      edge branch = BRANCH_EDGE (bb), fallthru = FALLTHRU_EDGE (bb);
+      insert_edge_check_and_trap (branch, false, cop, lhs, rhs);
+      insert_edge_check_and_trap (fallthru, true, cop, lhs, rhs);
+    }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+gimple_opt_pass *
+make_pass_harden_conditional_branches (gcc::context *ctxt)
+{
+  return new pass_harden_conditional_branches (ctxt);
+}
+
+unsigned int
+pass_harden_compares::execute (function *fun)
+{
+  basic_block bb;
+  FOR_EACH_BB_REVERSE_FN (bb, fun)
+    for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_last_bb (bb);
+	 !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_prev (&gsi))
+      {
+	gassign *asgn = dyn_cast <gassign *> (gsi_stmt (gsi));
+	if (!asgn)
+	  continue;
+
+	/* Turn:
+
+	   z = x op y;
+
+	   into:
+
+	   z = x op y;
+	   z' = x' cop y';
+	   if (z == z') __builtin_trap ();
+
+	   where cop is a complementary boolean operation to op; and x'
+	   and y' hold the same value as x and y, but in a way that does
+	   not enable the compiler to optimize the redundant compare
+	   away.
+	*/
+
+	enum tree_code op = gimple_assign_rhs_code (asgn);
+
+	enum tree_code cop;
+
+	switch (op)
+	  {
+	  case EQ_EXPR:
+	  case NE_EXPR:
+	  case GT_EXPR:
+	  case GE_EXPR:
+	  case LT_EXPR:
+	  case LE_EXPR:
+	  case LTGT_EXPR:
+	  case UNEQ_EXPR:
+	  case UNGT_EXPR:
+	  case UNGE_EXPR:
+	  case UNLT_EXPR:
+	  case UNLE_EXPR:
+	  case ORDERED_EXPR:
+	  case UNORDERED_EXPR:
+	    cop = invert_tree_comparison (op,
+					  HONOR_NANS
+					  (gimple_assign_rhs1 (asgn)));
+
+	    if (cop == ERROR_MARK)
+	      /* ??? Can we do better?  */
+	      continue;
+
+	    break;
+
+	    /* ??? Maybe handle these too?  */
+	  case TRUTH_NOT_EXPR: /* Unary!  */
+	  case TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR:
+	  case TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR:
+	  case TRUTH_AND_EXPR:
+	  case TRUTH_OR_EXPR:
+	  case TRUTH_XOR_EXPR:
+	  default:
+	    continue;
+	  }
+
+	/* These are the operands for the verification.  */
+	tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (asgn);
+	tree op1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (asgn);
+	tree op2 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (asgn);
+
+	/* Vector booleans can't be used in conditional branches.
+	   ??? Can we do better?  */
+	if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op1)))
+	  continue;
+
+	gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE);
+
+	tree rhs = copy_ssa_name (lhs);
+
+	gimple_stmt_iterator gsi_split = gsi;
+	gsi_next (&gsi_split);
+
+	bool same_p = (op1 == op2);
+	op1 = detach_value (&gsi_split, op1);
+	op2 = same_p ? op1 : detach_value (&gsi_split, op2);
+
+	gassign *asgnck = gimple_build_assign (rhs, cop, op1, op2);
+	gsi_insert_before (&gsi_split, asgnck, GSI_SAME_STMT);
+
+	if (!gsi_end_p (gsi_split))
+	  {
+	    gsi_prev (&gsi_split);
+	    split_block (bb, gsi_stmt (gsi_split));
+	    gsi_next (&gsi_split);
+	    gcc_checking_assert (gsi_end_p (gsi_split));
+	  }
+
+	gcc_checking_assert (single_succ_p (bb));
+
+	insert_check_and_trap (&gsi_split, EDGE_TRUE_VALUE,
+			       EQ_EXPR, lhs, rhs);
+      }
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+gimple_opt_pass *
+make_pass_harden_compares (gcc::context *ctxt)
+{
+  return new pass_harden_compares (ctxt);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def
index d7a1f8c97a6..a3d854ca5a6 100644
--- a/gcc/passes.def
+++ b/gcc/passes.def
@@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
   NEXT_PASS (pass_lower_resx);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_nrv);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_gimple_isel);
+  NEXT_PASS (pass_harden_conditional_branches);
+  NEXT_PASS (pass_harden_compares);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_cleanup_cfg_post_optimizing);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_function_noreturn);
   NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_access);
diff --git a/gcc/tree-pass.h b/gcc/tree-pass.h
index eb75eb17951..5df71fd0c9e 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-pass.h
+++ b/gcc/tree-pass.h
@@ -642,6 +642,9 @@ extern gimple_opt_pass *make_pass_update_address_taken (gcc::context *ctxt);
 extern gimple_opt_pass *make_pass_convert_switch (gcc::context *ctxt);
 extern gimple_opt_pass *make_pass_lower_vaarg (gcc::context *ctxt);
 extern gimple_opt_pass *make_pass_gimple_isel (gcc::context *ctxt);
+extern gimple_opt_pass *make_pass_harden_compares (gcc::context *ctxt);
+extern gimple_opt_pass *make_pass_harden_conditional_branches (gcc::context
+							       *ctxt);
 
 /* Current optimization pass.  */
 extern opt_pass *current_pass;


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-18  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-18  4:50 Alexandre Oliva [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-23 17:41 Alexandre Oliva
2021-09-18  7:34 Alexandre Oliva
2021-09-18  6:25 Alexandre Oliva
2021-09-18  3:57 Alexandre Oliva
2021-09-18  3:40 Alexandre Oliva
2021-09-18  3:16 Alexandre Oliva
2021-09-15 17:03 Alexandre Oliva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210918045005.14FE33857C5D@sourceware.org \
    --to=aoliva@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).