From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 1914) id B84A13858D39; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:28:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B84A13858D39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc r12-6464] [Ada] Balance parentheses in comments about allocators X-Act-Checkin: gcc X-Git-Author: Piotr Trojanek X-Git-Refname: refs/heads/master X-Git-Oldrev: 4566dbce02a2c7d1334ab1a28ff92ade5768baad X-Git-Newrev: 13c0bf611a0f8dc73ac5ac463fcc6974eb55ae28 Message-Id: <20220111132805.B84A13858D39@sourceware.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:28:05 +0000 (GMT) X-BeenThere: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-cvs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:28:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13c0bf611a0f8dc73ac5ac463fcc6974eb55ae28 commit r12-6464-g13c0bf611a0f8dc73ac5ac463fcc6974eb55ae28 Author: Piotr Trojanek Date: Wed Jan 5 16:40:44 2022 +0100 [Ada] Balance parentheses in comments about allocators gcc/ada/ * sem_ch4.adb (Analyze_Allocator): Fix comment. * sem_eval.ads (Compile-Time Known Values): Likewise. Diff: --- gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb | 4 ++-- gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb index 42547e3b274..c916c215fb8 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch4 is -- parameters. Note that this is now a static error even if the -- subprogram is not the main program (this is a change, in an -- earlier version only the main program was affected, and the - -- check had to be done in the binder. + -- check had to be done in the binder). if Nkind (P) = N_Subprogram_Body and then Nkind (Parent (P)) = N_Compilation_Unit @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch4 is Find_Type (Subtype_Mark (E)); -- Analyze the qualified expression, and apply the name resolution - -- rule given in 4.7(3). + -- rule given in 4.7(3). Analyze (E); Type_Id := Etype (E); diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads b/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads index eb919f17cb4..4fdd5a1fae6 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_eval.ads @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ package Sem_Eval is -- The expression 'C' is not static in the technical RM sense, but for many -- simple record types, the size is in fact known at compile time. When we -- are trying to perform compile time constant folding (for instance for - -- expressions like C + 1, Is_Static_Expression or Is_OK_Static_Expression + -- expressions like C + 1), Is_Static_Expression or Is_OK_Static_Expression -- are not the right functions to test if folding is possible. Instead, we -- use Compile_Time_Known_Value. All static expressions that do not raise -- constraint error (i.e. those for which Is_OK_Static_Expression is true)