public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Sayle <sayle@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc r12-7417] PR tree-optimization/91384: peephole2 to eliminate testl after negl.
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 22:32:57 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220228223257.D755A3858D20@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28068d1115648adcc08ae57372170f3277915a0d

commit r12-7417-g28068d1115648adcc08ae57372170f3277915a0d
Author: Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
Date:   Mon Feb 28 22:30:27 2022 +0000

    PR tree-optimization/91384: peephole2 to eliminate testl after negl.
    
    This patch is my proposed solution to PR tree-optimization/91384 which is
    a missed-optimization/code quality regression on x86_64.  The problematic
    idiom is "if (r = -a)" which is equivalent to both "r = -a; if (r != 0)"
    and alternatively "r = -a; if (a != 0)".  In this particular case, on
    x86_64, we prefer to use the condition codes from the negation, rather
    than require an explicit testl instruction.
    
    Unfortunately, combine can't help, as it doesn't attempt to merge pairs
    of instructions that share the same operand(s), only pairs/triples of
    instructions where the result of each instruction feeds the next.  But
    I doubt there's sufficient benefit to attempt this kind of "combination"
    (that wouldn't already be caught by the tree-ssa passes).
    
    Fortunately, it's relatively easy to fix this up (addressing the
    regression) during peephole2 to eliminate the unnecessary testl in:
    
            movl    %edi, %ebx
            negl    %ebx
            testl   %edi, %edi
            je      .L2
    
    2022-02-28  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
    
    gcc/ChangeLog
            PR tree-optimization/91384
            * config/i386/i386.md (peephole2): Eliminate final testl insn
            from the sequence *movsi_internal, *negsi_1, *cmpsi_ccno_1 by
            transforming using *negsi_2 for the negation.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
            PR tree-optimization/91384
            * gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c: New test case.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386.md                 | 13 +++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index e7c54901d75..5e0a980e7ae 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -11011,6 +11011,19 @@
   [(set_attr "type" "negnot")
    (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
 
+;; Optimize *negsi_1 followed by *cmpsi_ccno_1 (PR target/91384)
+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:SWI 0 "general_reg_operand")
+	(match_operand:SWI 1 "general_reg_operand"))
+   (parallel [(set (match_dup 0) (neg:SWI (match_dup 0)))
+	      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])
+   (set (reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG) (compare:CCZ (match_dup 1) (const_int 0)))]
+  ""
+  [(set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))
+   (parallel [(set (reg:CCZ FLAGS_REG)
+		   (compare:CCZ (neg:SWI (match_dup 0)) (const_int 0)))
+	      (set (match_dup 0) (neg:SWI (match_dup 0)))])])
+
 ;; Special expand pattern to handle integer mode abs
 
 (define_expand "abs<mode>2"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..24a60a932ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+void foo (void);
+void bar (void);
+
+int
+test (int a)
+{
+  int r;
+
+  if (r = -a)
+    foo ();
+  else
+    bar ();
+
+  return r;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "testl" } } */


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-02-28 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220228223257.D755A3858D20@sourceware.org \
    --to=sayle@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).