[gcc r12-7446] testsuite: Add testcases for already fixed PR [PR100541]

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f2e72db8c03c960d8330305c1e92986373198ca

commit r12-7446-g5f2e72db8c03c960d8330305c1e92986373198ca
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 2 10:38:39 2022 +0100

    testsuite: Add testcases for already fixed PR [PR100541]
    
    These testcases started failing with r12-630 and one of them
    got fixed with r12-4531 (aka PR102764 fix and r12-4616 further
    improved the fix) and the other went latent in r12-2591 (i.e. threader
    changes) and I believe was fixed for real by the PR102764 fix too.
    
    2022-03-02  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR debug/100541
            * g++.dg/opt/pr100541-1.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-1.C | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9a73e15f98b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// PR debug/100541
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-O3 -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fcompare-debug" }
+
+int a, b, i, x, y;
+
+int
+foo ()
+{
+  int rcmd = 0;
+  switch (x) {
+  case 0:
+    if (i)
+      rcmd = 6;
+    if (y % 3)
+      int &m1 = rcmd = rcmd | 5;
+    break;
+  case 1:
+    rcmd = b;
+  }
+  if (rcmd != 7)
+    return rcmd;
+  return a;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..35624814ed4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// PR debug/100541
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fcompare-debug" }
+
+int INVALID_TILE;
+void GetSlopePixelZ();
+long RUNWAY_IN_block;
+struct Airport {
+  long flags;
+};
+struct Station {
+  Airport airport;
+} * HandleCrashedAircraft_st;
+short HandleCrashedAircraft_v_0;
+void HandleCrashedAircraft() {
+  Station *__trans_tmp_1 = INVALID_TILE ? nullptr : HandleCrashedAircraft_st,
+          *st;
+  if (HandleCrashedAircraft_v_0 && __trans_tmp_1 == nullptr &&
+      HandleCrashedAircraft_v_0 % 3)
+    GetSlopePixelZ();
+  if (HandleCrashedAircraft_v_0)
+    GetSlopePixelZ();
+  if (__trans_tmp_1)
+    st->airport.flags &= RUNWAY_IN_block;
+}