public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat <pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc r13-1430] [Ada] Avoid unwanted warnings for statically-known-successful assertions Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:50:32 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220704075032.D78C33874779@sourceware.org> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7c05e82037356ac4610e9e5d1365b345a17d0f7 commit r13-1430-gf7c05e82037356ac4610e9e5d1365b345a17d0f7 Author: Steve Baird <baird@adacore.com> Date: Tue May 24 14:09:14 2022 -0700 [Ada] Avoid unwanted warnings for statically-known-successful assertions The -gnatwc switch enables warnings for test condition outcomes that are known at compile time. Such warnings are unlikely to be useful in the case of an assertion expression (or a subexpression thereof), so do not generate them in that case. gcc/ada/ * sem_warn.adb (Warn_On_Constant_Valid_Condition): Do not generate a warning if the expression in question is an assertion expression, or a subexpression thereof. But do call Test_Comparison so that it can generate warnings for the cases that it generates warnings for. * sem_prag.ads: Modify Assertion_Expression_Pragma constant so that the predicate Sem_Util.In_Assertion_Expression_Pragma returns True for the expression of a Compile_Time_Error pragma. Diff: --- gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads | 1 + gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb | 9 +++++++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads index 0a1ad5bedf1..e8a65ce5011 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ package Sem_Prag is Pragma_Assert_And_Cut => True, Pragma_Assume => True, Pragma_Check => True, + Pragma_Compile_Time_Error => True, Pragma_Contract_Cases => True, Pragma_Default_Initial_Condition => True, Pragma_Initial_Condition => True, diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb index b23be725437..1d73f21e7de 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb @@ -3401,9 +3401,14 @@ package body Sem_Warn is False_Result => False_Result); -- Warn on a possible evaluation to False / True in the presence of - -- invalid values. + -- invalid values. But issue no warning for an assertion expression + -- (or a subexpression thereof); in particular, we don't want a + -- warning about an assertion that will always succeed. - if True_Result then + if In_Assertion_Expression_Pragma (Op) then + null; + + elsif True_Result then Error_Msg_N ("condition can only be False if invalid values present?c?", Op);
reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 7:50 UTC|newest] Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220704075032.D78C33874779@sourceware.org \ --to=pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).