public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hongtao Liu <liuhongt@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc r13-2925] Check nonlinear iv in vect_can_advance_ivs_p.
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 07:23:33 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220929072333.73D4F3858404@sourceware.org> (raw)
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f758d447d7f4699253c9f8ee345ba9b8357cdb22
commit r13-2925-gf758d447d7f4699253c9f8ee345ba9b8357cdb22
Author: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>
Date: Wed Sep 28 17:00:48 2022 +0800
Check nonlinear iv in vect_can_advance_ivs_p.
vectorizable_nonlinear_induction doesn't always guard
vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init when it's called by
vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer.
It's supposed to be guarded by vect_can_advance_ivs_p.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/107055
* tree-vect-loop-manip.cc (vect_can_advance_ivs_p): Check for
nonlinear induction variables.
* tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p): New
functions.
(vectorizable_nonlinear_induction): Put part codes into
vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p.
* tree-vectorizer.h (vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p): Declare.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/pr107055.c: New test.
Diff:
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107055.c | 4 ++
gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc | 10 ++++
gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 82 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
gcc/tree-vectorizer.h | 3 ++
4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107055.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107055.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..63bcb3d742e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107055.c
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1 -fno-tree-dce -fno-vect-cost-model -ftree-vectorize -fprofile-arcs" } */
+
+#include "../../gcc.dg/torture/pr24257.c"
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
index 74b221a973c..1d96130c985 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc
@@ -1413,6 +1413,7 @@ vect_can_advance_ivs_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
for (gsi = gsi_start_phis (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
{
tree evolution_part;
+ enum vect_induction_op_type induction_type;
gphi *phi = gsi.phi ();
stmt_vec_info phi_info = loop_vinfo->lookup_stmt (phi);
@@ -1432,6 +1433,15 @@ vect_can_advance_ivs_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
continue;
}
+ induction_type = STMT_VINFO_LOOP_PHI_EVOLUTION_TYPE (phi_info);
+ if (induction_type != vect_step_op_add)
+ {
+ if (!vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p (loop_vinfo, induction_type))
+ return false;
+
+ continue;
+ }
+
/* Analyze the evolution function. */
evolution_part = STMT_VINFO_LOOP_PHI_EVOLUTION_PART (phi_info);
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
index aabdc6f2d81..2536cc3cf49 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
@@ -8558,6 +8558,50 @@ vect_update_nonlinear_iv (gimple_seq* stmts, tree vectype,
return vec_def;
}
+
+/* Return true if vectorizer can peel for nonlinear iv. */
+bool
+vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
+ enum vect_induction_op_type induction_type)
+{
+ tree niters_skip;
+ /* Init_expr will be update by vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer,
+ if niters is unkown:
+ For shift, when shift mount >= precision, there would be UD.
+ For mult, don't known how to generate
+ init_expr * pow (step, niters) for variable niters.
+ For neg, it should be ok, since niters of vectorized main loop
+ will always be multiple of 2. */
+ if (!LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_KNOWN_P (loop_vinfo)
+ && induction_type != vect_step_op_neg)
+ {
+ if (dump_enabled_p ())
+ dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
+ "Peeling for epilogue is not supported"
+ " for nonlinear induction except neg"
+ " when iteration count is unknown.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* Also doens't support peel for neg when niter is variable.
+ ??? generate something like niter_expr & 1 ? init_expr : -init_expr? */
+ niters_skip = LOOP_VINFO_MASK_SKIP_NITERS (loop_vinfo);
+ if ((niters_skip != NULL_TREE
+ && TREE_CODE (niters_skip) != INTEGER_CST)
+ || (!vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p (loop_vinfo)
+ && LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (loop_vinfo) < 0))
+ {
+ if (dump_enabled_p ())
+ dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
+ "Peeling for alignement is not supported"
+ " for nonlinear induction when niters_skip"
+ " is not constant.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/* Function vectorizable_induction
Check if STMT_INFO performs an nonlinear induction computation that can be
@@ -8628,42 +8672,9 @@ vectorizable_nonlinear_induction (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
return false;
}
- /* Init_expr will be update by vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer,
- if niters is unkown:
- For shift, when shift mount >= precision, there would be UD.
- For mult, don't known how to generate
- init_expr * pow (step, niters) for variable niters.
- For neg, it should be ok, since niters of vectorized main loop
- will always be multiple of 2. */
- if (!LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_KNOWN_P (loop_vinfo)
- && induction_type != vect_step_op_neg)
- {
- if (dump_enabled_p ())
- dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
- "Peeling for epilogue is not supported"
- " for nonlinear induction except neg"
- " when iteration count is unknown.\n");
- return false;
- }
-
- /* Also doens't support peel for neg when niter is variable.
- ??? generate something like niter_expr & 1 ? init_expr : -init_expr? */
- niters_skip = LOOP_VINFO_MASK_SKIP_NITERS (loop_vinfo);
- if ((niters_skip != NULL_TREE
- && TREE_CODE (niters_skip) != INTEGER_CST)
- || (!vect_use_loop_mask_for_alignment_p (loop_vinfo)
- && LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (loop_vinfo) < 0))
- {
- if (dump_enabled_p ())
- dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
- "Peeling for alignement is not supported"
- " for nonlinear induction when niters_skip"
- " is not constant.\n");
- return false;
- }
+ if (!vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p (loop_vinfo, induction_type))
+ return false;
- if (!LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_KNOWN_P (loop_vinfo)
- && induction_type == vect_step_op_mul)
if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (vectype)))
{
if (dump_enabled_p ())
@@ -8799,6 +8810,7 @@ vectorizable_nonlinear_induction (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
gimple_seq stmts = NULL;
+ niters_skip = LOOP_VINFO_MASK_SKIP_NITERS (loop_vinfo);
/* If we are using the loop mask to "peel" for alignment then we need
to adjust the start value here. */
if (niters_skip != NULL_TREE)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
index 5e75ed1532b..4870c754499 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
+++ b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
@@ -2343,6 +2343,9 @@ extern tree cse_and_gimplify_to_preheader (loop_vec_info, tree);
/* Nonlinear induction. */
extern tree vect_peel_nonlinear_iv_init (gimple_seq*, tree, tree,
tree, enum vect_induction_op_type);
+extern bool
+vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
+ enum vect_induction_op_type induction_type);
/* In tree-vect-slp.cc. */
extern void vect_slp_init (void);
reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220929072333.73D4F3858404@sourceware.org \
--to=liuhongt@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).