public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r13-2963] c++: reduce temporaries in ?:
@ 2022-09-29 17:52 Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2022-09-29 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32b2eb59fb904926eff77811e08766a8ae6804a7

commit r13-2963-g32b2eb59fb904926eff77811e08766a8ae6804a7
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Sep 19 19:08:10 2022 +0200

    c++: reduce temporaries in ?:
    
    When the sides of ?: are class prvalues, we wrap the COND_EXPR in a
    TARGET_EXPR so that both sides will initialize the same temporary.  But in
    this case we were stripping the outer TARGET_EXPR and conditionally creating
    different temporaries, unnecessarily using extra stack.  The
    recently added TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE flag avoids this.
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * call.cc (build_conditional_expr): Set TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE on the
            outer TARGET_EXPR.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/tree-ssa/cond-temp1.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/call.cc                             |  8 +++++++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/cond-temp1.C | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index 3506b0fcfbb..9fad3cb950b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -6009,7 +6009,13 @@ build_conditional_expr (const op_location_t &loc,
 	 but now we sometimes wrap them in NOP_EXPRs so the test would
 	 fail.  */
       if (CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (result)))
-	result = get_target_expr (result, complain);
+	{
+	  result = get_target_expr (result, complain);
+	  /* Tell gimplify_modify_expr_rhs not to strip this in
+	     assignment context: we want both arms to initialize
+	     the same temporary.  */
+	  TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE (result) = true;
+	}
       /* If this expression is an rvalue, but might be mistaken for an
 	 lvalue, we must add a NON_LVALUE_EXPR.  */
       result = rvalue (result);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/cond-temp1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/cond-temp1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b15635853f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/cond-temp1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// Test that the ?: only creates one temporary.
+// { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-gimple" }
+// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct A" 2 "gimple" } }
+
+struct A
+{
+  int i;
+  A(int);
+};
+
+bool b;
+int main()
+{
+  A a = 1;
+  a = b ? A(2) : A(3);
+}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-09-29 17:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-29 17:52 [gcc r13-2963] c++: reduce temporaries in ?: Jason Merrill

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).